Examples of corona bonds:
Issuer
|
Type
|
Tenor
|
Issued Amount
|
Announced
|
Use of Proceeds (related to the pandemic)
|
European Investment Bank
|
Sustainability
|
3y
8Y
|
SEK 3bn
EUR 1bn
|
March 2020
April 2020
|
Financing areas directly related to the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Support to national health authorities and hospitals, laboratory facilities and networks.
|
African Development Bank
|
Social
|
3y
3y
|
USD 3bn
SEK 2.5bn
|
March 2020
April 2020
|
Support and financing to countries’ and businesses’ fight against COVID-19.
Support and financing to countries’ and businesses’ fight against COVID-19.
|
Nordic Investment Bank
|
Thematic
|
3y
3y
|
EUR 1bn
SEK 4bn
|
March 2020
April 2020
|
Finance projects that aim to alleviate the social and economic consequences of the pandemic in the Bank’s member countries and eventually support the recovery process of the countries.
|
International Finance Corporation
|
Social
|
3y
5y
|
USD 1 bn
SEK 3 bn
|
March 2020
March 2020
|
Supporting underserved communities in developing countries, including countries affected by the coronavirus.
|
Inter-American Development Bank
|
Thematic
|
5y
5y
|
USD 2bn
USD 4.25bn
|
March 2020
April 2020
|
Support the immediate public health response, the safety nets for vulnerable populations, economic productivity and employment, fiscal policies for the amelioration of economic impacts.
|
Council of Europe Development Bank
|
Social
|
7y
|
EUR 1bn
|
April 2020
|
Support CEB member countries in mitigating the social and economic impact of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis
|
Indonesia
|
Thematic
|
10.5y
30.5y
50y
|
USD 1.65bn
USD 1.65bn
USD 1bn
|
April 2020
April 2020
April 2020
|
Partially fund the country’s COVID-19 relief and recovery efforts
|
Relevant frameworks and target groups for corona bonds
As shown above, the corona bonds are supporting different activities and are structured in different ways. Some of the bonds are social bonds, some sustainability bonds and others non-labelled thematic bonds. Some of the above issuances have been under existing social bond frameworks, some under a new one and others under no framework.
One issue that often comes up in the context of social bond frameworks is how to define the so-called “target population.” Issuance of a social bond requires a defined target group, which will benefit from the proceeds. It is often said that “green is global, while social is local,” yet the current pandemic is very much a global issue that affects everyone. This means that some projects will benefit the general public, which should then also be the defined target population in the framework for that particular category.
The International Capital Market Association (ICMA), together with the International Finance Corporation, has developed a collection of case studies to provide guidance and illustrative examples for the use of proceeds as well as the definition of target population when issuing a corona bond. The examples include projects such as research and development of vaccines and other medications, with the general public as the target group, and loans to small businesses hit by the pandemic, with small businesses and employees as the target population. Find more examples here.
Future development
The social bond format has generally been seen as challenging, due of the wide range of opinions regarding what is social and what is not. However, with issuances related to the corona crisis, we expect to see less ambiguity regarding the use of proceeds definition. Denise Odaro from the IFC explains it well in the ICMA podcast, “Social Bonds on the rise”:
“The reason green bonds have been such a successful product is the momentum around climate change. In the social space, we all have our ideas about what social issues are, and that often leads to lengthy debates. However, this current pandemic has gravely affected public health and brought the global economy pretty much to a standstill. No one is contesting whether this is a social issue. No one can turn a blind eye.” (edited for length and clarity)
The corona bond format opens up opportunities, not only for sovereigns and supranationals, but also for corporates, which may have struggled to define the social contribution or relevant target population and therefore refrained from issuing social bonds in the past.
About the authors:
Ebba Ramel is an analyst in Nordea’s Sustainable Bonds team.
Jacob Michaelsen is Head of Sustainable Finance Advisory at Nordea.