Ursäkta...

Den här sidan finns tyvärr inte på svenska.

Stanna kvar på sidan | Gå till en relaterad sida på svenska

We live in a world where cybercrime generates more revenue than the illegal drug trade. These are not opportunistic hackers working from their basements. It is organised crime on a vast scale, targeting the weakest link – whether a large corporation, a small business or a sole trader. If criminals find a way in, they will exploit it. The consequences can be devastating.

That is why cybersecurity must be at the top of the board’s agenda – not delegated to IT or reviewed only once a year. It must remain a priority.

Everyone is exposed – but the least prepared are targeted first

A common misconception is that cyber risk primarily concerns large companies with complex digital infrastructure. It does not. Cybercriminals strike wherever they find an opportunity – and the least prepared make the easiest targets.

If criminals encounter strong defences, they are likely to move on. That is the key insight for any board: you do not need to be impenetrable, but you do need to be better prepared than the next target.

The board’s role – understand your unique exposure

The starting point is not technology, but the business. The board needs to understand the company’s specific exposure. Which technologies and online services does it use? Which third-party providers does it depend on, and how prepared are they? How reliant is the company on digital channels to serve its customers?

With that understanding, the board should define a clear risk appetite. What level of risk is acceptable? Which systems must remain operational under all circumstances? The answers should guide decisions on backups, data resilience and how quickly the company can switch to alternative systems after an attack.

A common misconception is that cyber risk primarily concerns large companies with complex digital infrastructure. 

Three pieces of advice

1. Understand your unique exposure
Map the vulnerabilities in your business model, the technology you use, the services you depend on and the third parties with access to your systems. You cannot manage a risk you have not defined.

2. Train, train, train
Train employees to practice good cyber hygiene. Test contingency plans so everyone knows how to respond if an attack succeeds. Prepare the board and management to act, ensuring that they know which third-party specialists can help contain an attack quickly. A contingency plan that has never been tested is not a plan. It is just a document.

3. Make cybersecurity a standing agenda item
Cybersecurity is not a one-off exercise. The board needs regular reporting: Are systems being patched and updated? When were contingency plans last tested? The conversation must be ongoing, because the company’s preparedness needs to keep pace with the threat.

Business growth
Insights
After reading this article, is your perception of Nordea? (Required)
* Required fields are shown with an asterisk.
Pandora flagship store in Copenhagen

Corporate insights

How Pandora turned a silver crisis into a resilience story

Financial hedging can buy valuable time when markets move rapidly. Pandora’s treasury team used that time to support a broader business response, combining risk management, pricing initiatives and structural change, as the price of silver rose.

Read more
Minimani shop

Sustainability

Energy efficiency investments deliver savings and a better shopping experience at Minimani

Nordea and Caverion collaborate to promote and finance energy efficiency projects of buildings. The aim is to help companies identify opportunities to reduce energy consumption, improve the energy efficiency of properties, and find the right investment solutions.

Read more
President Trump meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (Official White House photo)

Corporate insights

Beyond the headlines: Understanding the new US tariff model

Drawing on insights from Nordea's recent Trade Trends webinar with Richard Hayes, Chief Strategist in Transaction Banking, this article examines what the Canada-US trade dispute reveals about the evolving architecture of US trade policy and the implications for Nordic corporates.

Read more